.jpg)
There should have been reservation in judiciary also
-Jitendra Awhad of Sharad Pawar group said – this was not expected from him
Mumbai NCP leader Jitendra Awhad of Sharad Pawar faction has once given such a statement, which can be controversial. In fact, this time he has raised questions on the judiciary. Jitendra Awhad said that Babasaheb Ambedkar should have made provision for reservation in judiciary also. He also accused some decisions of the judiciary of being casteist.
What did Jitendra Awhad say?
In his address at a program, Jitendra Awhad said that 'I feel sad today, Babasaheb Ambedkar should have kept reservation in the judiciary also. I will not speak on this, because it may lead to controversy. But we smell casteism from some decisions. This is not expected from the judiciary. He should be impartial and stay away from casteism. This was expected in the Constitution, but is this happening?
also accused the speaker
Awhad alleged at an event in Nagpur that the decision given by Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar regarding disqualification of MLAs was typed in Delhi. Awhad also alleged that the BJP is using the name of Lord Ram for political gains.
It is worth noting that even before this there was a huge controversy over a statement by Jitendra Awhad. Awhad had described Lord Ram as a non-vegetarian, on which people had strongly criticized Awhad. As the controversy escalated, Awhad also apologized for his statement.
-Jitendra Awhad of Sharad Pawar group said – this was not expected from him
Mumbai NCP leader Jitendra Awhad of Sharad Pawar faction has once given such a statement, which can be controversial. In fact, this time he has raised questions on the judiciary. Jitendra Awhad said that Babasaheb Ambedkar should have made provision for reservation in judiciary also. He also accused some decisions of the judiciary of being casteist.
What did Jitendra Awhad say?
In his address at a program, Jitendra Awhad said that 'I feel sad today, Babasaheb Ambedkar should have kept reservation in the judiciary also. I will not speak on this, because it may lead to controversy. But we smell casteism from some decisions. This is not expected from the judiciary. He should be impartial and stay away from casteism. This was expected in the Constitution, but is this happening?
also accused the speaker
Awhad alleged at an event in Nagpur that the decision given by Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar regarding disqualification of MLAs was typed in Delhi. Awhad also alleged that the BJP is using the name of Lord Ram for political gains.
It is worth noting that even before this there was a huge controversy over a statement by Jitendra Awhad. Awhad had described Lord Ram as a non-vegetarian, on which people had strongly criticized Awhad. As the controversy escalated, Awhad also apologized for his statement.
-Jitendra Awhad of Sharad Pawar group said – this was not expected from him
Mumbai NCP leader Jitendra Awhad of Sharad Pawar faction has once given such a statement, which can be controversial. In fact, this time he has raised questions on the judiciary. Jitendra Awhad said that Babasaheb Ambedkar should have made provision for reservation in judiciary also. He also accused some decisions of the judiciary of being casteist.
What did Jitendra Awhad say?
In his address at a program, Jitendra Awhad said that 'I feel sad today, Babasaheb Ambedkar should have kept reservation in the judiciary also. I will not speak on this, because it may lead to controversy. But we smell casteism from some decisions. This is not expected from the judiciary. He should be impartial and stay away from casteism. This was expected in the Constitution, but is this happening?
also accused the speaker
Awhad alleged at an event in Nagpur that the decision given by Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar regarding disqualification of MLAs was typed in Delhi. Awhad also alleged that the BJP is using the name of Lord Ram for political gains.
It is worth noting that even before this there was a huge controversy over a statement by Jitendra Awhad. Awhad had described Lord Ram as a non-vegetarian, on which people had strongly criticized Awhad. As the controversy escalated, Awhad also apologized for his statement.
